The Duality Of Power In Nursing Supervision: A Systematic Review Of Barriers, Facilitators, And Technological Innovations In Clinical Supervision Practices Across Healthcare Settings
Article Sidebar
Abstract:
Background: Nursing supervision is a pivotal managerial instrument for determining quality of care, yet its implementation remains fragmented across primary care, emergency departments, nursing homes, clinical education, newly graduated nurse orientation, and operating rooms, resulting in inconsistent outcomes.
Aims: To synthesize recent empirical evidence (2021–2026) on the conceptualization, barriers and facilitators, and innovative strategies in nursing supervision.
Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines using PubMed (n=143), PubMed Central (n=961), and ScienceDirect (n=2,552), yielding 3,656 records. After filtering (2021–2026, open access), 415 records remained; 386 unique records were screened, with 142 eligible after title and abstract screening. Full-text assessment excluded 130 records (macro-level hospital management = 120; irrelevant outcomes = 8; non-empirical = 2), resulting in 12 studies for synthesis.
Results: Thematic synthesis identified nursing supervision as a dual construct: power repressive-disciplinary and productive-supportive, influenced by structural-organizational gaps, resource constraints, supervisor competence and readiness, and relational-communicative dynamics. Quantitative evidence involving 495 clinical mentors across 30 hospitals showed that institutional psychological support and formal training were independently associated with improved mentoring motivation, attitudes, and practices (OR=2.908; 95% CI=1.430–5.913; p=0.003). Innovations included the Johari-window-based self-awareness model, Severinsson’s Nursing Supervision Model, reflective group supervision in clinical orientation, and validated non-technical skills instruments (inter-rater reliability 0.83–0.91), complementing gamification and the 3V6W framework.
Conclusion: Effective nursing supervision requires a shift from vertical control to horizontal dialogue, supported by institutional investment, continuous formal training, standardized instruments, and educational technology.
Keywords: Nursing supervision, Clinical supervision, Power relations, Barriers and facilitators, Clinical mentoring, Systematic review
Copyright (c) 2026 Afif Dwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alhassan, A., Sencherey, V. L., Bobuafor, C., Berchie, G. O., & Abraham, S. A. (2025). Practices and challenges of supervision and delegation in nursing in Africa: A scoping review. BMC Nursing, 24, 1094. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03683-9
Anggeria, E., & Damanik, D. W. (2022). Effective Clinical Supervision in Nursing: Systematic Review. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10, 525–530. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9672
Benz, P., & Bühlmann, F. (2024). Structural Power and Epistemologies in the Scientific Field: Why a Rapid Reconciliation Between Functional and Evolutionary Biology is Unlikely. Minerva, 62(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09520-0
de Klerk, T., Temane, A., & Downing, C. (2023). The development and implementation of a model to facilitate self-awareness of professionalism for enrolled nurses. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 41(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101221134758
de Paula, M., Folgado, D., João, A., & Madeira, A. (2026). Structured clinical supervision in perioperative nursing: A systematic review of its impact on professional development and patient safety. Nursing Reports, 16(6), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16060197
Galiano, C., Moura, A. A., Gleriano, J. S., Mininel, V. A., Trovó, M. C., Figueiredo, M. F., Goulart, B. F., & Chaves, L. D. P. (2025). Nursing supervision in the mobile pre-hospital emergency care service. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 59, e20240238. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0238en
Gallen, J. (2023). Transitional Justice and the Historical Abuses of Church and State. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025973
González‐García, A., Díez‐Fernández, A., Leino‐Kilpi, H., Martínez‐Vizcaíno, V., & Strandell‐Laine, C. (2021). The relationship between clinical placement duration and students’ satisfaction with the quality of supervision and learning environment: A mediation analysis. Nursing and Health Sciences, 23(3), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12855
Hedlund, J., Blomberg, K., Hjelmqvist, H., & Jaensson, M. (2024). Nurse anaesthetists’ experiences of student nurse anaesthetist learning during clinical practice: a qualitative interview study. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01818-y
Kjellsdotter, A., Sundberg, F., Wills, J., & Berglund, M. (2026). Belonging to a community Newly graduated nurses' lived experiences of participating in an introduction program: A phenomenological hermeneutical study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 40, e70238. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70238
Masamha, R., Alfred, L., Harris, R., Bassett, S., Burden, S., & Gilmore, A. (2022). ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers’’: A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature.’ Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(9), 2678–2692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283
Mlambo, M., Silén, C., & McGrath, C. (2021). Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2
Nakrem, S., Stensvik, G.-T., Skjong, R. J., & Ostaszkiewicz, J. (2019). Staff experiences with implementing a case conferencing care model in nursing homes: a focus group study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Raliphaswa, M. R., Luhalima, T. R., & Mafumo, J. L. (2026). Registered professional nurses' experiences regarding supervision of nursing care at selected hospitals of Limpopo province. Curationis, 49(1), a2846. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v49i1.2846
Sérgio, M. S. S. B., Carvalho, A. L. R. F., & Pinto, C. M. C. B. (2023). Perception of Portuguese nurses: Clinical supervision and quality indicators in nursing care. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 76(3), e20220656. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0656
Silva, I. S., Mininel, V. A., & Silva, J. A. M. (2022). Nursing supervision: Interfaces with power relations in family health. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 56, e20220034. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0034en
Silva, R., Camelo, R., Pinto, C., Campos, M. J., Ferreira, M. C., & Fernandes, C. S. (2025). Content validation and testing of a gamified web tool for nursing supervision. Journal of Research in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251392436
Wang, Y., Hu, S., Yao, J., Pan, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, H. (2024). Clinical nursing mentors' motivation, attitude, and practice for mentoring and factors associated with them. BMC Nursing, 23, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01757-8
Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Bian, M., Li, X., Yue, Z., & Zhang, C. (2024). Pathways for identifying problems in nursing quality on-site supervision: A descriptive qualitative study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 6109–6120. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S493896
Zhao, Y., Liao, L., Feng, H., Chen, H., & Ning, H. (2021). Enablers and barriers to implementing care quality improvement program in nursing homes in China. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 532. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02488-0
